| |
A significant
challenge facing the success of PSAs is air time: for donated space,
it is not surprising that networks are not prioritizing or carefully
strategizing the placement of PSAs. While it appears that the Ad
Council has successfully harnessed the creative talent of ad agencies
willing to work pro bono, there continue to be hurdles in the distribution
phase. The problem isn't getting them made, it's getting them seen. |
|

|
One question
raised by our investigation is: how successful are these
ads in the long-run? The goals of the campaign are surprising:
it is not atypical for the Ad Council to seize upon measures of
success that might be considered ancillary or only half-steps
to the goal. They often relate to the distribution: how many fliers
were distributed; how much airtime was secured. Sometimes, the
goals are concrete: how many people call a listed 800 number.
Most of their stated goals in their presentation do not appear
to correlate with the measures of success they are pursuing (as
far as we can discern); their strategy proposal indicates
that people are already aware of the dangers of obesity and the
benefits of exercise/healthy diet, but their campaign seeks to
measure this awareness anyway, rather than focusing on measuring
changes in behavior.
(click for full-size .pdf image)
Development and Goal Chart for another Weight
Reduction Campaign, VERB, by the CDC
|
|
| |
The reasons
behind this focus are clear. As evidenced by the flow chart created
by a different campaign against obesity -- VERB, by the CDC --
there are many steps on the road to behavioral change;
seeing one ad for 30 seconds is not likely to create a sea change
in a person's lifestyle. (Though, notably, advertisements
do appear to influence people's consumer habits; otherwise, why
would companies spend millions for a spot at the Super Bowl?)
Since PSAs are not aimed at influencing a single purchase but
rather a shift in lifestyle choices, campaigns often develop short-
and medium-term goals that serve as checkpoints toward their goal.
For example, in the VERB campaign, the CDC may end up measuring
how well parents are informed about the ad campaign. Then, among
those who are aware, the CDC can measure how their knowledge and
beliefs have changed as a result. Then, among those who
have been educated by the ad, the CDC can measure how many have
subsequently encouraged their children to initiate physical activity.
And so on. With such an ambitious goal, the act of determining
and evaluating each presumed step along the way will help the
campaign determine where it needs to put more energy in the future.
All told, it
is probably wise for the Ad Council not to be so ambitious as
to measure their success on the ultimate reduction in obesity;
there are so many other factors that influence whether or not
someone will choose a healthy lifestyle. In general, while the
Ad Council realizes that people already know about the dangers
of obesity (see step 2, and the transtheoretical model), the "awareness"
and "knowledge" aspects of behavioral change may be
the limits of an ad campaign's locus of control. The Small Steps
campaign attempts to bridge this gap by providing consumers with
new information and suggestions that they can do immediately.
The hope: when the message is a do-able, suggested behavioral
change -- rather than a simple alert to a problem, perhaps PSAs
can expand their realm of influence.
Of course,
it requires further research to determine whether the
lack of focused distribution prevents institutions like the Ad
Council from determining the ultimate effectiveness of its campaigns.
|
 |